A Modest Politico-Religious Proposal

So, I was in a strange mood the other night, possibly due to a combination of research, too much politics in my news, and having the entire world setting and the basic plots for a new book series jump me.

So. I was reading about the interconnections between religious duties and kingship in the Pre-classic and Classic Maya cultures of Central America.

A Mayan relief. Part of a museum exhibit 'The Blood of Kings" at the Kimbell Museum, Ft. Worth, TX.

A Mayan relief. Part of a museum exhibit ‘The Blood of Kings” at the Kimbell Museum, Ft. Worth, TX.

One of the continuities that seems to run from Olmec through Maya and later cultural groups in the need for priests, rulers, and a lot of other people to provide blood to feed the gods. We’re most familiar with the Aztecs, but other cultural groups had similar traditions on a smaller scale. You had to show your gratitude for the bounties of the soil and sky by giving back blood, treasure, and lives. Especially rulers and nobles, since they got more of the benefits.

Which led to a mild meditation on modern politics and leadership selection in various western countries and the oft-voice discontents of thoseย  involved in the election process at the qualities and apparent problems of the various political parties, candidates, and so on. One oft-voiced complaint is that too many leaders do not seem to grasp how their policies might affect the majority of people in their countries (see the 100,000 Germans who are suing to stop an EU-Canada trade agreement).

My modest meditation: What if politicians had to provide evidence of their desire for power and their willingness to sacrifice the same way the Mayan kings and queens did? You know, piercing your tongue with a cactus spine and dripping blood on paper to be burned as a sacrifice, drawing blood from those sensitive body parts we don’t mention on family blogs, running a thorn-laced rope through the lower lip on special occasions, and soon. Without anesthesia, although modern antibiotics would certainly be permitted, and clean and sterile bandages.

We’d know in a heartbeat who only wants the perks of office, who wants to have the power without the responsibility, and who has given thought to just what “serving one’s country” really means. And we’d be able to identify current and former politicos quite easily: they’d all have a visible and dramatic allergic reaction to spiny plants and sharp objects.


9 thoughts on “A Modest Politico-Religious Proposal

  1. Some of them would be quite willing to do it for the power, which doesn’t necessarily mean they are fit to handle the power. But at least we would have leaders with a spine, even if it was inserted through their mouth.

    • Can you imagine the voter fraud? 1000% voter turn out in some districts, instead of the 110% from 4 years ago. (And to think that Saddam was content with 99%)

  2. I’ve heard that there are those who believe that life here began out there, far across the universe, with tribes of humans who may have been the forefathers of the Egyptians, or the Toltecs, or the Mayans. ๐Ÿ˜›

    As to the modest proposal, it amuses me, but I fear it would do little to deter the power hungry. Perhaps a lottery system, a triathalon combined with puzzles, a maze challenge, or being first to pull a stone from a sword would work?

    • Thaaanks. I heard that in the original Baltar’s voice. ๐Ÿ™‚ I’d go for the sword in the stone. But you are not getting me into that lake. I only like water in captivity, thank you. No swimming in un-domesticated water for this little striped cat.

      • You’re welcome – I was hearing it in my head as I was reading your post. John Colicos had an awesome voice. I think that’s part of what made his characterizations of Kor and Baltar so impressive.

    • pull a stone from a sword

      And now I picture some cartoon villain trying to remove the stone from She-ra’s sword. Trying – and failing with some sort of badly arcing magic discharge.

  3. I think combat experience was supposed to be the European equivalent. The problem is that anything can be gamed. I think that Eisenhower made a good President.

    • Yes, it was, and can be. Bo Biden served in the military (for example) but not in a combat unit (he was JAG, as I recall). Does being a lawyer in uniform differ that much from being a lawyer in a civilian suit? It probably depends on the individual.

Comments are closed.